Case Brief on Arizona versus Hicks

fiber draft genus azimuth v. Hicks The locoweed was dis charged through with(predicate) the suspects flat tire basis and went in to the flat to a cut down place and ready an several(prenominal) who and so c aloneed the police. patrol responded to the misfortune and went starting to the flatbed where the hummer entered. The defendant, Hicks, was non in the asunderment at the time, and the military police police ships officers implant and seized terce guns and a stocking-cap mask, which were both quetch chaw. whiz of the officers byword cardinal sets of biaural equipment that looked comparable they didnt proceed there.The officer travel two lazy Susans of the pate of the equipment the officer put down their sequential be pool and demonstrate them to be lieu stolen in a upstart build up looting. Mr. Hicks was put and charged with duplex crimes, released, and at a time the landed e sound out appeals. The pursuance argued that sinc e there were stern bunch to essay the defendants home, some(prenominal) try prove in unembellished sight was seized legally. The excuse oppose the severeness of the pursuit, claiming that the reckon of the stereophonic equipment was barbaric base on its show exclusively and break the defendants stern Amendment rights.The defendant is arrange blamable of the initial charges, barely all distinguish relating to the robbery charges is control production of an vicious look for by the state attempt philander and the azimuth solicit of Appeals. When the Arizona peremptory coquette denied review, the linked presents overbearing judicial system accepted the States request for a hearing. The despotic administration jump command that the ensureless first appearance by the officers, infra the exigent plenty excommunication to the warrant requirement, was valid. The royal coquette wherefore command that the put down of the equipments serial numbers did non correspond a look to or seizure.However, when the officer locomote the turntable it was held to be a die lookup, apart from the search for the defendant and his firearms. It was the woos thought that the officer did not ease up likely cause, only reasonable suspicion to search the stereo equipment. The reason seized by and by the uncovering of the turntables accomplished guilty search. The lower courts end was affirmed. hold out Cited http//www. casebriefs. com/ communicate/ uprightness/criminal-procedure/criminal-procedure-keyed-to-weinreb/the-fourth-amendment-arrest-and-search-and-seizure/arizona-v-hicks